chore: fix some function names in comment #2737
Conversation
Signed-off-by: cargoedit <[email protected]>
Summary of ChangesHello @cargoedit, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses minor textual inaccuracies by updating function names within code comments. The changes ensure that the comments correctly describe the associated functions, specifically changing references from 'GetSequencerInfo' to 'GetSignerInfo' in both Rust and Go generated code. This improves code readability and maintainability without altering any functional logic. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly fixes outdated comments in several auto-generated Rust and Go files. While the fixes themselves are accurate, the practice of manually editing generated files is discouraged as it can lead to maintenance issues and inconsistencies with the source protobuf definitions. The recommended approach is to run the project's code generation scripts to update these files, ensuring they are in sync with their source. I have added comments to the changed files highlighting this process issue.
| self.inner.unary(req, path, codec).await | ||
| } | ||
| /// GetSequencerInfo returns information about the sequencer | ||
| /// GetSignerInfo returns information about the signer |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This comment fix is correct, but this file is auto-generated (// This file is @generated by prost-build.). Manually editing generated files should be avoided to prevent inconsistencies. Please regenerate the files from the source .proto definitions using the project's build scripts instead.
| tonic::Status, | ||
| >; | ||
| /// GetSequencerInfo returns information about the sequencer | ||
| /// GetSignerInfo returns information about the signer |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Similar to the previous comment, this change is correct but is applied to a generated file. Please consider regenerating the proto files instead of editing them manually to maintain consistency.
| // GetNamespace returns the namespace for this network | ||
| GetNamespace(context.Context, *connect.Request[emptypb.Empty]) (*connect.Response[v1.GetNamespaceResponse], error) | ||
| // GetSequencerInfo returns information about the sequencer | ||
| // GetSignerInfo returns information about the signer |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While this comment fix is correct, this file is auto-generated (// Code generated by protoc-gen-connect-go. DO NOT EDIT.). Manually editing generated files can lead to inconsistencies. The recommended approach is to re-run the code generation scripts to update these files automatically from the source .proto file.
| // GetNamespace returns the namespace for this network | ||
| GetNamespace(context.Context, *connect.Request[emptypb.Empty]) (*connect.Response[v1.GetNamespaceResponse], error) | ||
| // GetSequencerInfo returns information about the sequencer | ||
| // GetSignerInfo returns information about the signer |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As with the ConfigServiceClient interface, this change is correct but is made to a generated file. It's best practice to regenerate these files from the source .proto file rather than editing them by hand.
Code ReviewSummaryThis PR fixes incorrect function documentation comments that referenced GetSequencerInfo when they should reference GetSignerInfo. The changes are correct and improve code clarity. Positive Findings ✅
Critical Issue
|
Code ReviewSummaryThis PR fixes incorrect documentation comments in generated protobuf code. The comments were referencing GetSequencerInfo when they should reference GetSignerInfo to match the actual function name. ✅ Positive Aspects
|
Code ReviewSummaryThis PR fixes incorrect function name references in auto-generated protobuf comments. The changes are correct and improve code documentation accuracy. ✅ Code Quality & Best Practices
🔍 AnalysisFiles Changed:
Root Cause: 📝 Observations
|
Code ReviewSummaryThis PR fixes incorrect function names in generated code comments. The comments incorrectly referred to ✅ Positive Aspects
📝 Observations
|
Pull Request ReviewSummaryThis PR fixes incorrect function name references in comments for the ✅ Code QualityPositive aspects:
🔍 Issues Found1. Inconsistent comment in Rust client code (Minor) The comment at /// Get SequencerInfo
pub async fn get_signer_info(&self) -> Result<GetSignerInfoResponse>This should be updated to: /// Get SignerInfo
Since this is handwritten client code (not generated), it needs to be fixed manually in this PR. 2. Regeneration consideration The files being modified are generated code (from protobuf definitions):
According to the project's make proto-genQuestion: Were these files manually edited, or were they regenerated from an updated proto definition? If manually edited, they will be overwritten on the next 📝 Recommendations
Test Coverage✅ No functional code changes - only documentation comments updated Security Concerns✅ None - documentation-only changes Performance Impact✅ None - no runtime changes Overall AssessmentThis is a valid documentation fix, but it appears to be addressing symptoms rather than the root cause. The generated code should automatically use the correct RPC method name in comments. Please verify whether this fix will persist after the next proto generation run. Verdict: Approve with minor suggestions for the handwritten client code fix and verification of the generation process. |
Pull Request ReviewSummaryThis PR corrects documentation comments in generated protobuf code, changing "GetSequencerInfo" references to "GetSignerInfo" to match the actual function name. ✅ Code Quality and Best Practices
🔍 Potential Issues
🔒 Security ConcernsNo security issues identified - this is a documentation-only change. ⚡ Performance ConsiderationsNo performance impact - comments do not affect runtime behavior. 🧪 Test CoverageNo test changes needed - this is a documentation fix that does not alter functionality. 📝 Recommendations
VerdictThe intent is good (fixing incorrect documentation), but the approach should be adjusted. Consider regenerating the protobuf files from source rather than manually editing generated code to ensure long-term maintainability. Review generated with assistance from Claude Code |
Code ReviewSummaryThis PR fixes outdated comments in auto-generated protobuf files. The comments incorrectly referred to "GetSequencerInfo" when the method is actually "GetSignerInfo". ✅ Positive FindingsCorrectness: The changes are accurate and necessary. The proto definition in Completeness: All 4 occurrences of the incorrect comment have been identified and fixed:
Consistency: Aligns the generated documentation with the source proto file.
|
|
code should be regenerated instead of modified |
Overview
fix some function names in comment